
This study screened large cohorts of node-positive and node-negative breast cancer patients to determine whether the G388R mutation of the FGFR4 gene is a useful prognostic marker for breast cancer as reported by Bange et al in 2002. Node-positive (n=139) and node-negative (n=95) breast cancer cohorts selected for mutation screening were followed up for median periods of 89 and 87 months, respectively. PCR - RFLP analysis was modified to facilitate molecular screening. Curves for disease-free survival were plotted according to the Kaplan - Meier method, and a log-rank test was used for comparisons between groups. Three other nonparametric linear rank-tests particularly suitable for investigating possible relations between G388R mutation and early cancer progression were also used. Kaplan - Meier analysis based on any of the four nonparametric linear rank tests performed for node-positive and node-negative patients was not indicative of disease-free survival time. G388R mutation of the FGFR4 gene is not relevant for breast cancer prognosis.
Adult, Genotype, Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Mutation, Missense, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Disease-Free Survival, Cohort Studies, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Aged, Signal Transduction
Adult, Genotype, Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Mutation, Missense, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Disease-Free Survival, Cohort Studies, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, Aged, Signal Transduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
