
pmid: 3496384
Abstract The present study was an in vitro attempt to define the effector mechanisms against the intracellular bacterium Legionella pneumophila. Monocytes from human peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were infected in vitro with L. pneumophila and cultured for 2 days to allow intracellular replication of the bacterium. Cells were then labeled with 51Cr and used as targets in a 4-h 51Cr-release assay. We report here that autologous nonadherent PBL effectively lysed infected monocytes, and this activity was enhanced when the effector cells were precultured with IL 2 for 2 days. The IL 2-activated killer cells were also cytolytic against uninfected cultured monocytes, but cytotoxicity was higher against Legionella-infected target cells in a dose-dependent manner. The effector cells were located in Percoll density fractions that were enriched for large granular lymphocytes. The phenotype of the effector cell activated by IL 2 was determined to be OKM1+, OKT11+, partially Leu-11+, and negative for Leu-M1, OKT4, OKT8, and Leu-7, indicating that it is neither a T cell nor a monocyte, and is possibly and NK subset that is Leu-11+ and Leu-7-. Cold target inhibition studies indicated that a similar recognition structure is shared by both infected and uninfected monocytes, but differs from that on K562 tumor target cells. Thus, in addition to tumor surveillance and controlling viral infections, killer cells can be activated to provide protection against intracellular bacterial infections.
Cytotoxicity, Immunologic, Macrophages, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Legionella, In Vitro Techniques, Cell Fractionation, Monocytes, Killer Cells, Natural, Antigens, Surface, Leukocytes, Humans, Interleukin-2
Cytotoxicity, Immunologic, Macrophages, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Legionella, In Vitro Techniques, Cell Fractionation, Monocytes, Killer Cells, Natural, Antigens, Surface, Leukocytes, Humans, Interleukin-2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 78 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
