Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Chemical Sensesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Chemical Senses
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Article . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Chemical Senses
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Chemical Senses
Article . 1997
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Oral Irritant Effects of Nicotine: Psychophysical Evidence for Decreased Sensation following Repeated Application of and Lack of Cross‐Desensitization to Capsaicina

Authors: J M, Dessirier; M, O'Mahony; E, Carstens;

Oral Irritant Effects of Nicotine: Psychophysical Evidence for Decreased Sensation following Repeated Application of and Lack of Cross‐Desensitization to Capsaicina

Abstract

ABSTRACT: When delivered to the oral mucosa, a variety of naturally occurring chemicals such as capsaicin from red chili peppers, piperine from black pepper, and nicotine from tobacco, cause a diffuse burning sensation often referred to as irritation. The burning sensation evoked by capsaicin increases when delivered repeatedly at 1 min intervals (sensitization), but then decreases markedly following a 10 min rest period (self‐desensitization. It is also interesting that following desensitization by capsaicin, irritant sensations evoked by other chemicals are also reduced (cross‐desensitization), suggesting that oral irritation from some agents may be mediated by a population of capsaicin‐sensitive trigeminal polymodal nociceptors.Although nicotine is a major component in tobacco smoke, little is known about its sensory properties. Accordingly, a study of the oral irritant effects of nicotine as compared with capsaicin was initiated.Whereas capsaicin (0.5 or 3 ppm; repeated at 1 min intervals over 10 min) evoked significantly stronger sensations (sensitization), there was a significant decrement in sensations to repeated application of nicotine (0.1%). After the subjects had received either repeated capsaicin or nicotine on one side of the tongue, a rest period ensued followed by a bilateral application of either capsaicin or nicotine. Subjects were, then, asked to choose which side yielded a stronger sensation (two‐alternative forced choice). Following capsaicin pretreatment, all subjects reported that capsaicin evoked a stronger sensation on the previously unseated side (capsaicin self‐desensitization). Similar self‐desensitization was observed with nicotine. Furthermore, nicotine was reported to evoke a significantly weaker sensation on the side of the tongue pretreated with capsaicin (cross‐desensitization). In contrast, equal numbers of subjects reported capsaicin to evoke a stronger sensation on either the nicotine‐pretreated side or the untreated side, indicating an absence of cross‐desensitization. These results are discussed in terms of physiological mechanisms that might underlie the contrasting sensory effects of nicotine versus capsaicin.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Nicotine, Adolescent, Mouth Mucosa, Ganglionic Stimulants, Tongue, Taste, Sensation Disorders, Irritants, Psychophysics, Humans, Female, Capsaicin

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    80
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
80
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze