
pmid: 20089318
The cochleotoxic effects of aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, are well-established. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible differences in cochleotoxic effects between once-daily administration (ODA) and twice-daily administration (TDA) of amikacin simulating pediatric dosing.Twenty-one rabbits were used. Seven animals received intramuscularly amikacin once daily (ODA-group) and seven received the drug twice daily (TDA-group), for a total time period of 2 weeks. All the animals were subjected to Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) every 3 days since beginning of the experiment. The rest 7 animals did not receive any medication and served as controls (Control group). Two measurements (7 and 14 days) were obtained following the cease of drug administration.Reduced cochlear activity (as depicted in the respective reduced DPOAE-amplitudes) compared to the pre-treatment state was found in both ODA- and TDA-groups. Cochlear activity was reduced at a wider range of frequencies (from 593 to 4031Hz in TDA-group and from 593 to 1093Hz in ODA-group) and to a higher degree in group B than in group A. Cochlear activity was reduced earlier in ODA-group than in TDA-group. No differences to the pre-treatment state were observed in the control group.The above findings suggest that less frequent administration in higher dose of amikacin is associated with minimal cochleotoxicity.
Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous, Animals, Female, Prospective Studies, Rabbits, Amikacin, Injections, Intramuscular, Drug Administration Schedule, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer, Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous, Animals, Female, Prospective Studies, Rabbits, Amikacin, Injections, Intramuscular, Drug Administration Schedule, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
