
In a condition of genuine egalitarian inclusion, a “constitutional conception” of popular sovereignty derived primarily from the “constitutional patriotism” associated with Jürgen Habermas can resolve the key challenges associated with the countermajoritarian problem in constitutional theory as well as the problem of constituent power in democratic theory. It does so by providing a conceptual basis for an understanding of the the constitutional demos as a corporate body extending across time capable of ongoing legitimation. However, the constitutional conception cannot justify states, such as the United States, characterized by the durable exclusion of some legitimate members of the polis from political institutions. Even under the constitutional conception, the United States is not a legitimate constitutional democracy in virtue of its treatment of Black Americans. Nonetheless, there is an important tradition in Black American constitutional thought, beginning with Frederick Douglass, which represents American constitutional institutions as conditionally worthy of attachment in virtue of their latent normative potential. The correct conception of constitutional legitimacy for the United States combines Douglass's insights, and those of his intellectual heirs, with those working in the tradition which Habermas represents.
LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies|African American Studies, History, intellectual theory, Law and Philosophy, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies|African American Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy, African American Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy|Ethics and Political Philosophy, bepress|Law|Jurisprudence, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, LawArXiv|Law|Law and Philosophy, bepress|Arts and Humanities|History|Intellectual History, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy, Ethics and Political Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law|Constitutional Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|History, bepress|Law|Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, constitutional theory, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy|Ethics and Political Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law, bepress|Law, Intellectual History, Constitutional Law, Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law|Jurisprudence, democratic theory, bepress|Arts and Humanities|History, Arts and Humanities, bepress|Law|Law and Philosophy, Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|History|Intellectual History
LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies|African American Studies, History, intellectual theory, Law and Philosophy, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies|African American Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy, African American Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy|Ethics and Political Philosophy, bepress|Law|Jurisprudence, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies, LawArXiv|Law|Law and Philosophy, bepress|Arts and Humanities|History|Intellectual History, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy, Ethics and Political Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law|Constitutional Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|History, bepress|Law|Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, constitutional theory, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Philosophy|Ethics and Political Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law, bepress|Law, Intellectual History, Constitutional Law, Philosophy, LawArXiv|Law|Jurisprudence, democratic theory, bepress|Arts and Humanities|History, Arts and Humanities, bepress|Law|Law and Philosophy, Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|History|Intellectual History
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
