
Two obstacles limit the application of oxidoreductase-based asymmetric synthesis. One is the consumption of high stoichiometric amounts of reduced equivalent. The other is the low solubility of organic substrates, intermediates, and products in the aqueous phase. In order to address the two obstacles of oxidoreductase-based asymmetric synthesis, a biphasic bioelectrocatalytic system was constructed and applied.. In this study, the preparation of chiral β-hydroxy nitriles catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhS) and halohydrin dehalogenase (HHDH) was investigated as a high-value organic product. Diaphorase (DH) was immobilized by cobaltocene-modified poly(allylamine) redox polymer on the electrode surface (DH/Cc-PAA bioelectrode) to realize the effective bioelectrocatalytic NADH regeneration. AdhS is a NAD-dependent dehydrogenase, so the diaphorase modified biocathode was used to regenerate NADH to support the conversion from ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate (COBE) to ethyl (S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate ((S)-CHBE) catalyzed by AdhS. The addition of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) as organic phase not only increased the uploading of COBE, but also prevented the spontaneous hydrolysis of COBE and extended the lifetime of DH/Cc-PAA bioelectrode, and finally increased the Faradaic efficiency and the concentration of generated (R)-ethyl-4-cyano-3-hydroxybutyrate ((R)-CHCN). After 10 hours of reaction, the highest concentration of (R)-CHCN in biphasic bioelectrocatalytic system achieve 25.5 mM with 81.2% enantiomeric excess (ee p). The conversion ratio of COBE achieved 85%, which was 8.8 times higher than that of single phase system. Besides COBE, the other two substrates with aromatic ring structures were also used in this biphasic bioelectrocatalytic system to prepare corresponding chiral β-hydroxy nitriles. The results indicate that the biphasic bioelectrocatalytic system has the potential to produce a variety of β-hydroxy nitriles with different structures.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
