Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Bloodarrow_drop_down
Blood
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Blood
Article . 2008
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Differential requirement for DOCK2 in migration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells versus myeloid dendritic cells

Authors: Kazuhito Gotoh; Ayumi Inayoshi; Yoshinori Fukui; Takehiko Sasazuki; Ryoichi Takayanagi; Yoshihiko Tanaka; Akihiko Nishikimi; +1 Authors

Differential requirement for DOCK2 in migration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells versus myeloid dendritic cells

Abstract

Abstract The migratory properties of dendritic cells (DCs) are important for their functions. Although several chemokines and their receptors have been implicated in DC migration, the downstream signaling molecules are largely unknown. Here we show that DOCK2, a hematopoietic cell-specific CDM family protein, is indispensable for migration of plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), but not myeloid DCs (mDCs). Although DOCK2-deficiency did not affect development of pDCs, DOCK2-deficient (DOCK2−/−) mice exhibited a severe reduction of pDCs in the spleen and lymph nodes. Adoptive transfer experiments revealed that DOCK2−/− pDCs failed to migrate into the periarteriolar lymphoid sheaths of the spleen. In DOCK2−/− pDCs, chemokine-induced Rac activation was severely impaired, resulting in the reduction of motility and the loss of polarity during chemotaxis. In contrast, DOCK2−/− mDCs did not show any defects in Rac activation and migration. These results indicate that pDCs and mDCs use distinct molecules to activate Rac during chemotaxis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Cell Movement, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Animals, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Myeloid Cells, Dendritic Cells, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    63
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
63
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!