Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2019
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2019
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Collection 32: U.S. Top Newspapers (sample of all articles)

Authors: WhatEvery1Says (WE1S) Project;

Collection 32: U.S. Top Newspapers (sample of all articles)

Abstract

A collection of word-frequency and other data representing 204,617 unique articles (no duplicates or close variants) published during 2012-2018 in 15 top U.S. newspapers and their associated online blogs. WE1S and other researchers use this data to look for broad patterns and help guide closer study. Included is data based on an approximately 1:40 proportional balance between articles mentioning "humanities" (about 5,000) and a sample of articles on everything else (about 200,000 more or less "random" documents found through searching on common English words). In essence, the collection is a sampled representation of "everything" in these sources for these years (limited by the fact that it is not feasible to know how many articles were actually published in these publications, to determine how completely they were collected in available database repositories, or to harvest everything from such databases.) In this collection, the word "humanities" occurs 7,226 times in 4,976 documents. "Science" or "sciences" combined occur 25,693 times. ("science: 22,811 times in 12,319 documents; "sciences" 2,882 times in 2,277 documents). Mentions of the "humanities" are thus 28% the number of mentions of "science(s). News sources in this collection (in order of number of articles for each) are: New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, News Day, New York Post, Houston Chronicle, Daily News, USA Today, Dallas Morning News, Denver Post, Washington Post, Boston Globe, Star Tribune (Minneapolis), Seattle Times, Tampa Bay Times. Collection Metadata Created by: Lindsay Thomas Created on: November 14th 2019, 12:00:00 am WE1S Collection Registry ID: 20191114_1518_us-humanities-comparison-top-newspapers-unsampled Data sources: LexisNexis (via LN Web Services Kit), ProQuest, and direct scraping from the Web. Suggested Citation for Collection WhatEvery1Says (WE1S) Project. (2019, July 06). Collection 32: U.S. Top Newspapers (sample of all articles). doi: http://10.5281/zenodo.4940326.

WE1S makes available only "non-consumptive use" word frequency, topic model, and other datasets along with their visualizations. Datasets cannot be used to access, read, or reconstruct the original texts. (See WE1S Research Materials Overview for the relation between the project's "datasets" and "collections.")

Keywords

Humanities, Journalism, FOS: Humanities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2