
Appendectomy is amongst the most common general surgical procedures and the laparoscopic approach is recognized and recommended by international guidelines as a valid option. The different closure techniques of the appendicular stump constitute a matter of debate since their possible implication in determining postoperative infectious complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare endostapler versus endoscopic loop ties for stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy.This is a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies comparing endostapler with endoscopic loop ties for the closure of appendicular sump in laparoscopy appendectomy. Subgroup analysis of pediatric patients and patients with complicated appendicitis were performed when data were available. Complicated acute appendicitis was defined as in case of gangrenous/necrotic appendix or perforated appendix. Main outcomes were wound infection rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, length of stay, readmission and reoperation rates.a total of 5934 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. Endostapler was associated with a similar intra-abdominal abscess rate (RR 0.88, 95%C.I. 0.54-1.43) but a lower incidence of wound infection (RR 0.54, 95%C.I. 0.22-0.97) Length of stay, readmission and reoperation rates were similar. In subgroups analysis endostapler reduces significantly the wound infection rate in pediatric patients; no differences in main outcomes were observed in patients with complicated acute appendicitis.In complicated acute appendicitis the stump closure technique did not affect outcomes; the use of endostapler seems to be associated to a reduction of wound infection rate in pediatric patients with non-complicated acute appendicitis.
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Acute appendicitis; Appendicular stump; Endoloop; Endostapler; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Meta-analysis; Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Child; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Length of Stay; Male; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Wound Closure Techniques; Wound Infection, Abdominal Abscess, Sutures, Wound Closure Techniques, Length of Stay, Appendicitis, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Acute appendicitis; Appendicular stump; Endoloop; Endostapler; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Meta-analysis;, Wound Infection, Appendectomy, Humans, Intraabdominal Infections, Female, Child
Adult, Male, Reoperation, Acute appendicitis; Appendicular stump; Endoloop; Endostapler; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Meta-analysis; Abdominal Abscess; Adult; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Child; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Length of Stay; Male; Postoperative Complications; Reoperation; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Wound Closure Techniques; Wound Infection, Abdominal Abscess, Sutures, Wound Closure Techniques, Length of Stay, Appendicitis, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Acute appendicitis; Appendicular stump; Endoloop; Endostapler; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Meta-analysis;, Wound Infection, Appendectomy, Humans, Intraabdominal Infections, Female, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
