
Abstract It remains unresolved how different BCR-ABL transcripts differentially drive lymphoid and myeloid proliferation in Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) leukemias. We compared BCR-ABL transcript type and level with kinase domain (KD) mutation status, genotype, and phenotype in 1855 Ph+ leukemias. Compared with e1a2/p190 BCR-ABL cases, de novo e13-e14a2/p210 Ph+ lymphoid leukemia more frequently showed CML-type background, had higher blast-normalized BCR-ABL transcript levels, and more frequent persistent BCR-ABL transcript in the absence of detectable lymphoblasts. Secondary lymphoid blast transformation of CML was exclusively due to e13/e14a2/p210 BCR-ABL but was associated, at a much higher level than p210 myeloid transformation, with acquisition of new KD mutations and/or Ph genomic amplification. In contrast, myeloid blast transformation was more frequently accompanied by new acquisition of acute myeloid leukemia-type chromosomal aberrations, particularly involving the EVI1 and RUNX1 loci. Therefore, higher kinase activity by mutation, transcriptional up-regulation or gene amplification appears required for lymphoid transformation by p210 BCR-ABL.
Chromosome Aberrations, Genotype, Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl, Gene Amplification, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, MDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus Protein, DNA-Binding Proteins, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Phenotype, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit, Mutation, Proto-Oncogenes, Humans, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Neoplasm, Transcription Factors
Chromosome Aberrations, Genotype, Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl, Gene Amplification, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, MDS1 and EVI1 Complex Locus Protein, DNA-Binding Proteins, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Phenotype, Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive, Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit, Mutation, Proto-Oncogenes, Humans, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Neoplasm, Transcription Factors
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
