Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Current Pathophysiological Findings in Bipolar Disorder and in its Subtypes

Authors: Emily C. Bell; Brent M McGrath; Peter H. Silverstone; Phillip H. Wessels; Michele Ulrich;

Current Pathophysiological Findings in Bipolar Disorder and in its Subtypes

Abstract

There have been many studies that have examined various aspects of the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder, with many positive findings in several areas of neuroimaging and metabolic abnormality. These studies might allow some conclusions to be drawn about the underlying pathophysiology. Additionally, it is of significant interest to determine if there are pathophysiological differences between patients with bipolar disorder type I (BPD-I) and those with bipolar disorder type II (BPD-II). The present review examines imaging studies in bipolar patients of possible structural changes (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) functional changes (focusing on functional MRI (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)), and those examining brain chemistry (utilizing magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)). Metabolic studies reviewed were those that examined 3-methoxy-4- hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG), cellular calcium, and protein kinase C (PKC). The results clearly suggest that BPD patients differ from controls on many of these measures. However, while there is evidence from genetic studies suggesting possible differences between BPD-II patients and BPD-I patients, the neuroimaging and metabolic studies to date do not support this, and there appear to be no consistent pathophysiologica differences between these subtypes from evidence available at present.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!