
This study investigates whether patient safety can be enhanced by the implementation of an automated electronic checklist (PlanCheck) for physics quality control review (QCR) of radiotherapy photon plans. PlanCheck evaluates both technical aspects and DVH constraints. Three hundred and thirty-one consecutively approved radiotherapy plans previously reviewed with manual QCR were retrospectively checked with PlanCheck. Four hundred and thirty-three (3.4%) of the 12783 automated technical checks executed in the 331 plans yielded an error. All errors were scored using the severity rating from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-100 report. Nineteen of these errors (4%) either could have affected or affected target dose (severity 5+) implicating a maximum dose difference to the target or a critical organ at risk of 0.5% to 10% and 3 errors could have resulted in stereotactic brain treatments being delivered to the wrong location (severity 10). Forty-seven breast cancer plans were retrospectively subjected to automated DVH check, 10 undocumented dose constraint violations were found. PlanCheck has been shown to reduce errors in manually reviewed radiotherapy plans and thus to enhance patient safety.
Patient safety, treatment planning, Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface script, patient safety, R895-920, Technical Note, Quality control, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being; name=SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, quality control, Treatment planning, eclipse scripting application programming interface script
Patient safety, treatment planning, Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine, Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface script, patient safety, R895-920, Technical Note, Quality control, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being; name=SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, quality control, Treatment planning, eclipse scripting application programming interface script
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
