
pmid: 33432733
AbstractA rapid, efficient, and environmentally friendly matrix solid‐phase dispersion microextraction was established to determine and quantify terpenoids in Radix Curcumae using ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography with a diode array detector. Various parameters affecting the extraction were investigated in detail, such as the grinding time, amount of adsorbent, type and concentration of elution solvent, and pH. The optimization of single‐factor and response surface methodology was performed to confirm the best conditions in this procedure. The final optimized conditions were obtained by applying 70 mg of cucurbituril as adsorbent, 149 s as the optimum grinding time, and 228 mM of 3‐(N,N‐dimethylpalmitylammonio)propanesulfonate aqueous solution (pH 6.5) as the optimal elution solvent. The validated method showed a satisfactory linear range of 0.10–10 µg/mL for curdione and furanodiene, 0.01–10 µg/mL for isocurcumenol and germacrone, and 0.05–10 µg/mL for furanodienone, while the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.9945 to 0.9970. The recoveries of the investigated analytes at two spiked concentration levels (0.1 and 1.0 µg/mL) ranged from 96.53 to 104.60%. In addition, this method displayed acceptable reproducibility (relative standard deviation ≤ 3.66%). The results showed that the newly proposed matrix solid‐phase dispersion microextraction method was successfully applied to analyze curdione, isocurcumenol, furanodienone, germacrone and furanodiene in Radix Curcumae samples.
Surface-Active Agents, Curcuma, Macrocyclic Compounds, Surface Properties, Terpenes, Adsorption, Particle Size, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Solid Phase Microextraction
Surface-Active Agents, Curcuma, Macrocyclic Compounds, Surface Properties, Terpenes, Adsorption, Particle Size, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Solid Phase Microextraction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
