Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Utility of adaptive servoventilation device software in assessing residual respiratory events in the treatment of central apneas

Authors: María Guadalupe Silveira; Gabriel Sampol; Roser Cambrodi; Alex Ferre; María José Jurado; Odile Romero; Patricia Lloberes;

Utility of adaptive servoventilation device software in assessing residual respiratory events in the treatment of central apneas

Abstract

Background: The utility of the device software in assessing residual apnea hypopnea index (AHI) on adaptative servoventilation (ASV) treatment has not been evaluated. Objectives: To assess the precision of the smart card device in assessing residual AHI in patients treated with ASV. Methods: Seven patients with central apneas (CA) and 9 patients with complex sleep apnea (CompSA) were offered ASV. A 3 months polysomnography (PSG) with the patient9s device was performed and the AHI recorded on the ASV smart card (ASV-AHI) was compared to the physician recorded PSG-AHI. Results: median baseline AHI was 50 (p25th-75th 48-81) with a central apnea index (CAI) of 37 (p25th-75th 22-57) in CA patients, and 46 (p25th-75th 41.5-60.5) with a CAI of 44 (p25th-75th 19-54.5) in CompSA patients. Two patients refused treatment, 3 used BiPAP autoSV Advanced and 11 AutoSet CS. The mean difference between PSG-AHI and ASV-AHI was 11.9 ± 9.6 (95% limits of agreement -6.90, 30.71), mostly representative of underscoring hypopneas, to a greater extent at a higher residual AHI. According to ASV device software, ASV correctly treated (AHI Conclusions: ASV device software underestimated residual AHI compared to manual scoring of PSG to a greater extent at a higher residual AHI.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!