
This article examines the salience of international affairs among the American mass public through an analysis of party imagery during four national election campaigns (1952, 1960, 1968, and 1976). First, we find considerable stability in the proportion of the electorate citing international affairs references, with the exception of 1976. Then looking separately at foreign policy and war and peace concerns, significant differences in salience occur between the two domains overtime. Finally, we also detect substantial differences between characteristics of individuals expressing foreign policy concerns and those mentioning war and peace; partisanship is related to mentions of war and peace, while education and media consumption are tied to foreign policy references.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
