
handle: 10197/3134
Abstract Phosphorus (P) desorption from P-saturated alum sludge, which was used as main substrate in a novel constructed wetland for wastewater treatment, was studied. Groups of batch experiments were designed and conducted to explore the efficiencies of P extraction using different acids (HCl, HNO3 and H2SO4) and bases (NaOH and KOH). The results showed that either acid or base is efficient for P extraction and the efficiency relied mainly on the concentrations of H+/OH−, not the type of acid or base. Considering the efficiency, price and safety of the acids and bases tested, H2SO4 was chosen as most suitable reagent for P extraction. A Box–Behnken experimental design based on the response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to evaluate the optimum of H2SO4 extraction. The optimal condition for the mass of sludge, H2SO4 concentration and volume was 0.8 g, 0.063 M and 142 ml, respectively. At such optimal condition, the maximum P extraction efficiency of 98.2% was achieved. Additionally, most of the main components of the saturated sludge, such as metals (Al, Ca, Mg and Fe), TOC (total organic carbon) and nitrogen can also be extracted. Overall, the results supported that H2SO4 seems to be an efficient and cost-effective reagent among all the reagents tested for P-saturated alum sludge treatment.
660, Constructed wetlands, RSM, Phosphorus, Base, Alum sludge, Constructed wetland, Response surfaces (Statistics), Water treatment plant residuals, Acid, Desorption, Chemical tests and reagents
660, Constructed wetlands, RSM, Phosphorus, Base, Alum sludge, Constructed wetland, Response surfaces (Statistics), Water treatment plant residuals, Acid, Desorption, Chemical tests and reagents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
