
pmid: 4571899
SUMMARY: Some factors which affect the results of carbon source utilization (CSU) tests were investigated with 187 strains of Gram-negative bacteria, chiefly non-fermentative. There was little difference between the results at 37 and 30°C. Repetition of tests showed that 5% of the results were non-reproducible. The variability was most pronounced with acetate, maleate and sucrose amongst the substrates and Loefflerella mallei amongst the bacteria. Prior induction of the bacterial enzymes before testing did not reduce variability nor show any other advantage. Analysis of the results by numerical taxonomic methods revealed differences in the groups of bacteria derived from the results of CSU tests compared with those derived from conventional biochemical test results. CSU tests readily provide a large number of taxonomic features with the advantage of a simple standardized testing procedure.
Bacteriological Techniques, Sucrose, Bacteria, Bordetella, Chromobacterium, Maleates, Acetates, Flavobacterium, Carbon, Enzyme Induction, Pseudomonas, Moraxella, Alcaligenes, Neisseria
Bacteriological Techniques, Sucrose, Bacteria, Bordetella, Chromobacterium, Maleates, Acetates, Flavobacterium, Carbon, Enzyme Induction, Pseudomonas, Moraxella, Alcaligenes, Neisseria
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
