
The objective function (Bhatti, Practical optimization methods: with mathematica applications, Springer, New York, 2000 [1]; Brandt et al, Criteria and methods of structural optimization, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers, Dordrecht, Warszawa, 1986, [2]; Rao, Engineering optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, Hoboken, 2009, [3]) for fitting of the criterion to the measured data can be formulated in many ways, which lead to different results. The following three kinds of objective functions mathematical, physical, and geometrical can be considered (Altenbach et al, Plasticity of pressure-sensitive materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–152, 2014, [4]; Kolupaev et al, Strength hypothesis applied to hard foams Appl Mech Mater, 70, 99–104, 2011, [5]).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
