Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Diabetesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Diabetes
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Beta-Cell Function after Gastric Bypass

Authors: ANKIT SHAH; KIARRA LEVESQUE; MICHAEL AHLERS; MARLENA M. HOLTER; FATIMA ALAM; ESMERALDA PIERINI; BETSY L. ROJAS; +9 Authors

Beta-Cell Function after Gastric Bypass

Abstract

β-cell glucose sensitivity (BCGS) improves after gastric bypass (RYGB) in individuals in diabetes (DM2) remission. We sought to assess BCGS (pmol/kg/min/mM) after an oral glucose test (OGT) and an IV graded glucose infusion (GGI) in subjects with and without DM2 remission after RYGB. Twenty five subjects with DM2 were studied with GGI and 75g-OGT before and 3 months after RYGB. Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, insulin secretion rate, GLP-1 and BCGS were assessed during the OGT and the GGI. Data are presented as mean±SD. Within and between group comparisons with paired and unpaired t-test; GLM with repeated measure to assess change during OGT or GGI were (SPSS 24). Of the 25 subjects studied pre-surgery, 10 experienced DM2 remission (REM), 9 remained with DM2 (N-REM) at 3 months; 6 remained glucose intolerant and were not included in the analysis. Pre-surgery BMI (41.5±4.7 kg/m2), weight (108.3±15.9 kg), age (43.8±8.8 years), gender (95% female), HOMA-IR (12.1±6.7) and Matsuda index did not differ between groups; N-REM had longer DM2 duration (14 vs. 2.5 y p<0.001), higher HbA1c (8.2±1.0 vs. 7.0±0.8%, p=0.01) and more likely to be taking insulin (7/9 vs. 0/10 p<0.001). Prior to RYGB, OGT-BCGS was 4x greater (0.83±0.60 vs. 0.22±0.24, p=0.01) and GGI-BCGS was 2.5x greater (0.48±0.30 vs. 0.18±0.15, p=0.04) in REM vs. N-REM. Weight loss did not differ for REM and N-REM (17±5%). HOMA-IR, GLP-1 and GGI-BCGS improved similarly in both groups. OGT-BCGS increased in both groups, but more in REM vs. N-REM (+1.31±1.0 vs. +0.30±0.28, p=0.01). The difference between OGT-BCGS and GGI-BCGS observed pre-RYGB (0.58±0.54 vs. 0.38±.035, p=ns) was exaggerated at 3 months by 4x in REM (2.13±1.vs. 0.58±0.15, p=0.001) and ∼2.5x in N-REM (0.60±.0.43 vs. 0.24±0.17, p=0.07). In conclusion, β-cell function assessed during an IV GGI improves by the same magnitude regardless of DM2 remission status after RYGB. However, β-cell function improved more in REM than N-REM after oral glucose, suggesting a greater incretin effect, or other gut-related mechanisms, in REM after RYGB. Disclosure A. Shah: Employee; Spouse/Partner; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited. K. Levesque: None. M. Ahlers: None. M.M. Holter: None. F. Alam: None. E. Pierini: None. B.L. Rojas: None. V. Mark: None. K. Patel: None. R. Dutia: None. E.J. Harvey: None. K. Park: None. N. Koshy: None. S.J. Belsley: None. J.J. Mcginty: None. B. Laferrere: None.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!