<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
AbstractWe report on a 16‐year‐old girl with a multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation condition, in which a 1.7 Mb tandem duplication of chromosome region 16p13.3 was detected by array‐CGH. Mental retardation was moderate (IQ 45), with very limited speech. She had tall stature with relative microcephaly. Clinical manifestations included distinctive facial appearance with deep set eyes, narrow palpebral fissures, wide nasal bridge, long philtrum, rounded nasal tip, thin upper lip, protruding mandible and abnormal auricles, hand and foot anomalies. The causal 16p13.3 duplication is one of the smallest reported so far, and includes the CBP gene, whose haploinsufficiency is responsible for the Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome. By comparing clinical manifestations of our patient with those of patients carrying similar rearrangements, we could infer that 16p13.3 microduplications encompassing the Rubinstein–Taybi region result in a recognizable clinical condition, most likely representing a single gene disorder. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome, Adolescent, Gene Dosage, Chromosome Mapping, cbp duplication; multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome, CREB-Binding Protein, Phenotype, Face, Gene Duplication, Intellectual Disability, Humans, Female, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome, Adolescent, Gene Dosage, Chromosome Mapping, cbp duplication; multiple congenital anomalies/mental retardation syndrome, CREB-Binding Protein, Phenotype, Face, Gene Duplication, Intellectual Disability, Humans, Female, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |