
arXiv: 1910.01934
(see paper for full abstract) Cut problems and connectivity problems on digraphs are two well-studied classes of problems from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. After a series of papers over the last decade, we now have (almost) tight bounds for the running time of several standard variants of these problems parameterized by two parameters: the number $k$ of terminals and the size $p$ of the solution. When there is evidence of FPT intractability, then the next natural alternative is to consider FPT approximations. In this paper, we show two types of results for several directed cut and connectivity problems, building on existing results from the literature: first is to circumvent the hardness results for these problems by designing FPT approximation algorithms, or alternatively strengthen the existing hardness results by creating "gap-instances" under stronger hypotheses such as the (Gap-)Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH).
Extended abstract in IPEC 2019. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1707.06499
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 000 Computer science, knowledge, general works, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), 004, Steiner problems, connectivity, FPT inapproximability, Computer Science, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), cuts, Directed graphs, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics, ddc: ddc:004
FOS: Computer and information sciences, 000 Computer science, knowledge, general works, Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM), 004, Steiner problems, connectivity, FPT inapproximability, Computer Science, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), cuts, Directed graphs, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics, ddc: ddc:004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
