
pmid: 24252797
Synthetic polymers play a major role in drug delivery in vitro and in vivo. We report the bindings of biogenic polyamines, spermine (spm), and spermidine (spmd), and their synthetic analogues, 3,7,11,15-tetrazaheptadecane⋅4HCl (BE-333) and 3,7,11,15,19-pentazahenicosane⋅5HCl (BE-3333) with poly(ethylene glycol) PEG-3000, PEG-8000 and methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) anthracene (PEG-anthracene). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopic were used to analyze polyamine binding mode, the binding constant and the effect of PEG compositions on polyamine-polymer interaction. Structural analysis showed that polyamines bind PEG through hydrophobic and hydrophilic contacts with overall binding constants of Kspm-PEG-3000=3.1×10(4)M(-1), Kspmd-PEG-3000=5.5×10(4)M(-1), KBE-333-PEG-3000=2.5×10(4)M(-1), KBE-3333-PEG-3000=1.5×10(5)M(-1), Kspm-PEG-8000=4.1×10(5)M(-1), Kspmd-PEG-8000=7.5×10(5)M(-1), KBE-333-PEG-8000=4.5×10(4)M(-1), KBE-3333-PEG-8000=2.2×10(5)M(-1), Kspm-mPEG-ant=6.5×10(5)M(-1), Kspmd-mPEG-ant=1.1×10(6)M(-1), KBE-333-mPEG-ant=2.2×10(5)M(-1) and KBE-3333-mPEG-ant=6.9×10(4)M(-1). The number of binding sites (n) occupied by polyamines were from 0.2 to 0.5. Biogenic polyamines showed stronger affinity toward polymer complexation than synthetic polyamines, while weaker interaction was observed as polyamine cationic charges increased. Our results suggest that PEG and its derivative can act as carriers for delivering antitumor polyamine analogues to target tissues.
Anthracenes, Drug Carriers, Spermidine, Polyethylene Glycols, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Nanoparticles, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Spermine, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Anthracenes, Drug Carriers, Spermidine, Polyethylene Glycols, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Nanoparticles, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Spermine, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
