
This checklist is designed to help you prepare a promotion and tenure file that aligns withprofessional norms and is easy for evaluators to assess. Based on experience reviewing files asboth a committee member and external evaluator, it highlights professional expectations as wellas common errors and omissions that can obscure your strengths or even raise doubts forreviewers. While different disciplines, countries, and institutional contexts may vary, rememberthat your file will be read by both internal committees and external reviewers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
