Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Iberoamerica...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Generalizada en Cuidadores no Profesionales

Authors: Vanessa Blanco; Fernando Vázquez; María Guisande; María Sánchez; Patricia Otero;

Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Generalizada en Cuidadores no Profesionales

Abstract

espanolEl objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las propiedades psicometricas de la Escala de Autoeficacia Generalizada (GSES) en cuidadores no profesionales. Tres psicologas entrenadas recogieron los datos sociodemograficos y de la situacion de cuidado, la GSES, la CES-D, el ATQ-30 y la EPQ-R en 592 cuidadores (87.16% mujeres; edad media =55.41 anos). Posteriormente, dos expertos en evaluacion y diagnostico valoraron el diagnostico de episodio depresivo mayor, usando el SCID-5. La muestra total se dividio aleatoriamente en dos grupos para el analisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y el analisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC). La consistencia interna fue de α=.90. Un unico factor explico el 74.17% de la varianza total. Se encontraron correlaciones de la autoeficacia con extraversion, neuroticismo, sintomatologia depresiva y pensamientos automaticos negativos. La GSES discrimino entre cuidadores deprimidos y no deprimidos clasificando correctamente el 68% de los casos. ≤28 resulto un punto de corte adecuado para discriminar los cuidadores con o sin depresion. La GSES resulto un instrumento fiable y valido para evaluar la autoeficacia generalizada en cuidadores no profesionales. EnglishThe aim of this study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) in non-professional caregivers. Three trained psychologists collected the sociodemographic data and information on the situation of care, GSES, CES-D, ATQ-30 and EPQ-R of 592 non-professional caregivers (87.16% women, average age =55.41 years). Subsequently, two experts in assessment and diagnosis assessed a major depressive episode diagnosis using the SCID-5. The total sample was randomly divided into two groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The internal consistency was α=.90. A single factor explained 74.17% of the total variance. Self-efficacy was correlated with extraversion, neuroticism, depressive symptomatology, and negative automatic thoughts. The GSES discriminated between depressed and non-depressed caregivers by correctly classifying 68% of the cases. The value of ≤ 28 on the GSES was determined to be an appropriate cut-off point to discriminate between caregivers with or without depression. The GSES is a reliable and valid instrument to assess the generalized self-efficacy of non-professional caregivers.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
bronze