Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

DDRII Memory Packages Electrical Performance Comparison of COSBGA, TFBGA, and Standard TSOPII

Authors: Bryan Hsieh; Kevin Chiang; Y. P. Wang; C. S. Hsiao;

DDRII Memory Packages Electrical Performance Comparison of COSBGA, TFBGA, and Standard TSOPII

Abstract

The memory storage technology revolution has taken the consumer electronics by a storm in just two years. The volatile memory Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) for PC and notebook computing and gaming are increasing in density and speed. With all these improvement, the memory device packaging technology is also evolving rapidly, from the leadframe packages to BGA packages [2]. Under high frequency operation, the parasitics associated with package will significantly degrade the package performance. The DRAM packages are used primarily in the fabrication of DIMM modules that are inserted to the motherboards in PC and notebook computers. With newer DRAM technology in double date rate (DDR) and its second generation, DDR2, to be deployed just two years, it has higher clock rate and I/O number. Packages therefore are changing form the leadframe TSOP type 2 to faster CSPs such as fine pitch BGA (FBGA) and chip on substrate BGA (COSBGA). This paper is focused the COSBGA package [3,4]. In this paper, the packages electrical model have been established and performs signal integrity (SI) simulation. The COSBGA has smallest parasitics when comparison with other two packages. This paper also compares the performance of the COSBGA, TFBGA and TSOPII from crosstalk noise, time skew, insertion loss and return loss for IC designer reference.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!