
Additional file 2: Table S8. Reliability obtained using whole-genome sequence data, with or without annotation, compared to that obtained using a medium marker density panel. Table S9. Reliability of different methods when using different marker panels selected on the basis of functional information or with an LD pruning strategy. Table S10. Reliability obtained using marker panels selected on the basis of functional information and for models with or without the incorporation of functional annotation. Table S11. Heritability estimated with different models when using different marker panels. Table S12. Bias of different models using different marker panels, measured as the coefficient of regression of trait deviations on genomic predictions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
