
arXiv: 1704.02635
We develop an approach to subspace system identification using multiple data records and present a simple rank-based test for the adequacy of these data for fitting the unique linear, noise-free, dynamic model of prescribed state-vector, input-vector and output-vector dimensions. The approach is motivated by the prospect of sorting through archives of operational data and extracting a sequence of not-necessarily-contiguous data records individually insufficient for providing identifiability but collectively making this possible. The test of identifiability then becomes the sorting criterion for accepting or rejecting new data records. En passant, the familiar Hankel structure of the data matrices of subspace system identification is reinterpreted and revised.
I.1.5, 93B30, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, I.1.5; H.1.1; F.2.1, F.2.1, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, H.1.1
I.1.5, 93B30, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, I.1.5; H.1.1; F.2.1, F.2.1, Systems and Control (eess.SY), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Systems and Control, H.1.1
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
