
doi: 10.1002/kpm.1389
The objective of this paper is to investigate the impact that individual raters have on maturity assessments of organizations in the particular context of business process management (BPM). The hypotheses tested relate to the extent of the impact of individuals on maturity score variances and with the enforcing effect of organizational size on the disagreement among employees within organizations. Eight multilevel random‐effects analyses for eight separate maturity dimensions clarify the intra‐class correlation (agreement) within organizations. The analyses are based on a data set with a strictly hierarchical two‐level data structure of employees (1755) nested within organizations (61). Results show that variance within organizations is significantly larger than zero and is even more important than variance between organizations. We conclude that a large individual background effect exists when rating an organization's business process maturity. In addition, we find that the larger the organizations are, the more disagreement within organizations is visible. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
509018 Wissensmanagement, 505027 Administrative studies, 605005 Audience research, 509018 Knowledge management, 211903 Betriebswissenschaften, 211903 Science of management, 505027 Verwaltungslehre, 605005 Publikumsforschung, 102
509018 Wissensmanagement, 505027 Administrative studies, 605005 Audience research, 509018 Knowledge management, 211903 Betriebswissenschaften, 211903 Science of management, 505027 Verwaltungslehre, 605005 Publikumsforschung, 102
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
