Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

High-Dose (HD) Imatinib Provides Better Responses in Patients with Untreated Early Chronic Phase (CP) CML.

Authors: tsuko Aoki; Hagop Kantarjian; Susan O’Brien; Moshe Talpaz; Francis Giles; Srdan Verstovsek; William Wierda; +7 Authors

High-Dose (HD) Imatinib Provides Better Responses in Patients with Untreated Early Chronic Phase (CP) CML.

Abstract

Abstract Imatinib (standard dose, SD, 400mg/day) is highly effective in patients with CML in early chronic phase (CP). However, in a phase I study there was clear dose-response correlation and no maximum tolerated dose was identified up to 1000mg/day. Early reports suggested higher response rates with high dose (HD) imatinib (800 mg/day) in this setting. Here we report the long-term follow-up results of high-dose imatinib for patients with CML in early CP. Patients were included from 3 sequential trials: the first included 50 patients all treated with 400mg daily, and 2 subsequent studies included 208 patients all treated at 800 mg daily as the starting dose. There were no differences in pre-treatment characteristics between HD group and SD groups. The median age was 48 years in both groups. Median follow-up was 58 months for SD and 34 months for HD group. Patients treated with HD had a higher rate of complete cytogenetic responses (91% vs 76% in SD group, p=0.002) and these occurred earlier, with 88% achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) after 6 months of therapy (vs 56% with SD; p<0.00001). The cumulative incidence of major molecular response (MMR) was significantly higher in HD group at 6, 12, 36 and 48 month of follow-up: in HD group, 33%, 58%, 82% and 88% of patients had achieved this response at each time point (vs 2%, 22%, 64% and 67% in the SD group; p<0.00001, <0.00001, 0.01 and 0.002 at respective time point). The cumulative incidence of complete molecular response (CMR) was also significantly higher in HD group at 6, 12, 36 and 48 month of follow-up: in HD group, 8%, 20%, 53% and 66% of patients had achieved this response at each time point (vs 0%, 4%, 27%, and 34% in the SD group; p=0.05, 0.007, 0.003 and 0.0006 at respective time point). Progression-free and transformation-free survivals were significantly better in HD group (p=0.02 and 0.005). Overall survival was excellent in both groups with no difference between them. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was more frequent in HD group whereas extramedullary toxicity was similar in both groups. The frequency of ≥ grade 3 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in HD group was 12, 35, 29%, respectively while those in SD group were 4, 20, and 12%, respectively. The median actual dose in HD group was 800 mg at 24 months, with only 20% (15/75) of patients taking 400 mg or less at 36 months. We conclude that high-dose imatinib therapy in early CP-CML is associated with higher rates of CGCR, MMR and CMR, and these occur earlier, translating into better progression-free and transformation-free survival. Although HD imatinib is overall well tolerated, there is a higher rate of myelosuppression, most frequently occurring during the first weeks of therapy.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!