Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Paediatri...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Retinopathy of prematurity in infants weighing 1000‐1499 g at birth

Authors: Keith Cg; Lex W. Doyle; Lex W. Doyle;

Retinopathy of prematurity in infants weighing 1000‐1499 g at birth

Abstract

Objectives: To review the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants with birthweights 1000‐1249 g and 1250‐1499 g, to establish whether the upper weight limit for routine ophthalmological examination might safely be lowered.Methodology Prospective cohort study of infants born between 1 January 1977 and 31 December 1992 cared for in the neonatal nurseries at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne. Data were retrieved on 1373 infants who survived their initial hospitalization. They comprised 657 with birthweights 1000‐1249g (group 1) and 716 with birthweights 1250‐1499g (group 2). There were 76 outborn infants in group 1 and 97 in group 2; the remaining infants were all born at the Royal Women's Hospital. Ocular examinations commenced at 2 weeks of age, when possible, and at 2‐weekly intervals after that.Results In group 1, ROP was detected in 14.6% (96/657) and severe ROP (bilateral stage 3‐5) in 5.0% (33/657). Five (0.8%) children required surgical intervention (reaching threshold disease); following surgery, one was legally blind, one had severely impaired vision, and the other three had near‐normal vision. Another child was blind; he was born at 28 weeks gestational age with a birthweight of 1170g, and was transferred to a Level II hospital at 9 weeks chronological age with no detectable retinopathy. He returned 1 year later totally blind with detached retinae (grade 5 ROP). The prevalence of bilateral blindness in this group was 0.3% (2/657). In group 2, ROP was detected in 6.4% (46/716) and severe ROP in 0.8% (6/716). No children required surgery; three were found to be myopic at follow up but the corrected visual acuity was normal. No children in group 2 were blind. No significant difference was found between the rates of ROP in inborn and outborn infants.Conclusion In neonatal units with similar rates of ROP and visual outcome, routine ophthalmological examination in the neonatal nursery of infants weighing more than 1249g at birth is probably unnecessary.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Victoria, Incidence, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Blindness, Vision Screening, Reference Values, Birth Weight, Humans, Retinopathy of Prematurity, Prospective Studies, Infant, Premature

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?