Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The repository contains the raw SNP data in vcf format for the publication "How Array Design Creates SNP Ascertainment Bias". Note that the variants are not filtered at this timepoint. Samples starting with pl_ are pooled sequences of ~10 individuals while samples starting with i_ were individually sequenced. Please find detailed information about samples, raw sequencing data and SNP calling pipeline in the linked preprint (https://doi.org/10.1101/833541)/ publication (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245178). In case you need additional information, please contact johannes.geibel@uni-goettingen.de
{"references": ["Geibel et al. (2019): How Array Design affects SNP Ascertainment Bias; bioRxiv 833541; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/833541", "Geibel J, Reimer C, Weigend S, Weigend A, Pook T, Simianer H (2021) How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0245178. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245178"]}
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts