Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical Endocrinolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Endocrinology
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Response of plasma low density lipoprotein subfractions to oestrogen replacement therapy following surgical menopause

Authors: B, Griffin; E, Farish; D, Walsh; J, Barnes; M, Caslake; J, Shepherd; D, Hart;

Response of plasma low density lipoprotein subfractions to oestrogen replacement therapy following surgical menopause

Abstract

SummaryOBJECTIVE Epidemiological studies suggest that postmenopausal oestrogen replacement reduces the incidence of cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to establish the effects of oestrogen replacement therapy on subfractions of plasma low density lipoprotein in bilaterally oophorectomized women.DESIGN In a placebo controlled, double‐blind study, patients were randomized on a two to one basis to receive either oestradiol valerate (2 mg/day) or placebo respectively for a period of 16 weeks.PATIENTS Seventeen women aged 28–51 years who had all had hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at least 2 months before recruitment were assigned to either the active (n= 12) or placebo (n= 5) group.MEASUREMENTS Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins and LDL subfractions were determined immediately before and after the treatment period. LDL subfractions were isolated directly from plasma by density gradient ultracentrifugation within 24 hours. Non‐parametric statistical analysis was carried out within each group using Wilcoxon's signed rank test for matched pairs.RESULTS After 16 weeks of treatment, HDL cholesterol, apo A‐1 and HDL‐2 were increased in the group receiving oestrogen (HDL cholesterol +12%, P < 0.01; apo A‐I + 14%, P < 0.01; HDL‐2 + 24%P < 0.01). While there were no significant changes in serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or triglycerides, the proportion and concentration of the least dense LDL‐I subtraction was decreased significantly (‐27%, P < 0.05). The LDL subtraction of intermediate density (LDL‐II) was decreased in eight subjects, while small, dense LDL‐III was unaffected. Overall, these changes resulted in an apparent shift in the distribution of LDL subfractions towards small, dense LDL‐III, although there was no net increase in the latter.CONCLUSION In view of a similar and characteristic response of LDL subfractions to hypolipidaemic drugs that enhance the clearance of LDL via the LDL receptor, the present findings suggest that oestrogen promotes the preferential removal of LDL‐I and II by activating LDL receptors. As this effect is normally associated with a reduction in the circulating level of LDL, it should not be regarded as an unfavourable response to oestrogen replacement therapy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Estradiol, Lipoproteins, Ovariectomy, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Middle Aged, Hysterectomy, Lipids, Lipoproteins, LDL, Postmenopause, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Apoproteins

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!