Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Optimizing supportive measures for the safe administration of FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in advanced, inoperable pancreatic cancer (aPDAC) patients (pts) in routine clinical practice.

Authors: Carmen Nuzzo; Sabrina Vari; A. Torsello; Virginia Ferraresi; Alessandra Auriemma; Vanja Vaccaro; Giampaolo Tortora; +13 Authors

Optimizing supportive measures for the safe administration of FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment in advanced, inoperable pancreatic cancer (aPDAC) patients (pts) in routine clinical practice.

Abstract

e14661 Background: FOLFIRINOX is an important addition to our therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of aPDAC; however, safety and tolerability issues (hematologic toxicity, increased risk of AE in pts carrying biliary stents) may limit its use in routine clinical practice. Methods: We reviewed the clinical charts of 36 aPDAC pts receiving first-line FOLFIRINOX at two different institutions and analyzed toxicity and outcomes according to the presence or absence of a biliary stent and whether they received (n=21) or not (n=15) primary prophylactic G-CSF (d 7-9-11). Results: 36 pts (M/F: 22/14; median age: 57 yrs, range: 37-70; stage III/IV: 10/26; ECOG PS 0/1: 33/3) and 241 cycles were analyzed. Toxicity was mild with G3/4 adverse events (AE) in <1% of cycles, except for G3/4 neutropenia (16.6% of pts, 3.7% of cycles); dose was reduced to 75% in 48/205 cycles (23%); 3 pts discontinued treatment after 1 cycle (G3 gastro-intestinal toxicity in 1 pt and early progressive disease, PD in 2 pts). Overall and G3/4 toxicities were not significantly different in 7 pts carrying a biliary stent. G3/4 neutropenia was observed in 5/155 (3.2%) and 4/86 (4.6%) cycles among pts receiving or not G-CSF prophylaxis (p=n.s.); anemia and thrombocytopenia (any grade) were more common among pts receiving G-CSF (p<0.001 and p=0.009, respectively). Palonosetron/aprepitant/dexamethasone achieved complete control of nausea/vomiting at cycle 1 in 72% (95% CI: 58-87%) and 86% (95% CI: 75-97%) of pts. Partial response (PR) occurred in 25% and stable disease (SD) in 43% of 28 evaluable pts (disease control rate, DCR: 68%, 95% CI: 51-85%). A >50% reduction in CA19.9 occurred in 61% of pts. Median PFS was 8 mos (95% CI: 6-9 mos). Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX is well tolerated and easily manageable on an outpatient basis in young (<70 yrs) and fit (PS 0-1) aPDAC pts and can be safely used in pts carrying biliary stents. Routine G-CSF prophylaxis is not currently recommended, but may be useful to carefully extend FOLFIRINOX use to older/less fit/comorbid pts with aPDAC.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?