
ABSTRACTNew techniques are available for diagnosing leishmaniasis, but their efficacy in the identification of pediatric visceral leishmaniasis (VL) has not been compared with that of traditional methods. Blood, bone marrow, and urine samples were taken from 25 children with VL during their first clinical episode, 22 days after the start of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg/day on 6 days over a 10-day period), and when a relapse was suspected during follow-up. The results obtained suggest that antibody detection techniques, the antigen detection in urine (KAtex kit), andLeishmanianested PCR (LnPCR) analysis of the blood could be used for diagnosis of the first clinical episode. After treatment, clinical improvement was associated with negativization of Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle culture and microscopy of bone marrow aspirate, KAtex test, and LnPCR blood analysis results. Interestingly, LnPCR analysis of the bone marrow aspirate showed that sterile cure was not achieved in eight patients, two of which suffered a relapse within 10 to 20 weeks. All of the new noninvasive techniques tested showed high diagnostic sensitivity. However, LnPCR analysis of the bone marrow was the most sensitive; this test was able to detect the persistence of parasites and predict potential relapses.
Immunoassay, Male, Antiprotozoal Agents, Antibodies, Protozoan, Infant, Antigens, Protozoan, Urine, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Blood, Spain, Bone Marrow, Recurrence, Amphotericin B, Child, Preschool, Animals, Humans, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Female, Leishmania infantum, Child
Immunoassay, Male, Antiprotozoal Agents, Antibodies, Protozoan, Infant, Antigens, Protozoan, Urine, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Blood, Spain, Bone Marrow, Recurrence, Amphotericin B, Child, Preschool, Animals, Humans, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Female, Leishmania infantum, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 90 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
