
In many artificial intelligence, machine learning and computer vision tasks, the weighted sum model is used to value objects and define an order over them. In this paper, we consider two decision criteria defined as the (Euclidean and more generally Mahalanobis-like) distance to a reference point and investigate how they relate to the weighted sum model. In particular, we show that the distance-based representations can be seen as a relaxation of the representation induced by the weighted sum and we provide a characterization of the latter model with the former models in the case of strict orders. To illustrate our point, we consider the context of relative visual attributes. Nonetheless, our results also apply to other domains. More specifically, we present how these reference-point-based representations can be learned from pairwise comparisons and how they can be exploited for classification. Our experimental results show that those two criteria yield a more precise representation of the relative ordering for some attributes and that combining the best representations for each attribute improves recognition performance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
