<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Abstract Background Chromosome conformation capture studies suggest that eukaryotic genomes are organized into structures called topologically associating domains. The borders of these domains are highly enriched for architectural proteins with characterized roles in insulator function. However, a majority of architectural protein binding sites localize within topological domains, suggesting sites associated with domain borders represent a functionally different subclass of these regulatory elements. How topologically associating domains are established and what differentiates border-associated from non-border architectural protein binding sites remain unanswered questions. Results By mapping the genome-wide target sites for several Drosophila architectural proteins, including previously uncharacterized profiles for TFIIIC and SMC-containing condensin complexes, we uncover an extensive pattern of colocalization in which architectural proteins establish dense clusters at the borders of topological domains. Reporter-based enhancer-blocking insulator activity as well as endogenous domain border strength scale with the occupancy level of architectural protein binding sites, suggesting co-binding by architectural proteins underlies the functional potential of these loci. Analyses in mouse and human stem cells suggest that clustering of architectural proteins is a general feature of genome organization, and conserved architectural protein binding sites may underlie the tissue-invariant nature of topologically associating domains observed in mammals. Conclusions We identify a spectrum of architectural protein occupancy that scales with the topological structure of chromosomes and the regulatory potential of these elements. Whereas high occupancy architectural protein binding sites associate with robust partitioning of topologically associating domains and robust insulator function, low occupancy sites appear reserved for gene-specific regulation within topological domains.
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, cohesin, Cell Cycle Proteins, Genes, Insect, protein binding, K562 cell line, Mice, Drosophila Proteins, multiprotein complex, animal, genetics, Drosophila protein, Adenosine Triphosphatases, condensin, repressor protein, Chromosome Mapping, CCCTC-binding factor, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, chromosomal mapping, consensus sequence, Multigene Family, 570, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, transcription factor TFIIIC, cell cycle protein, Consensus Sequence, Animals, Humans, transcription factor III, human, gene, mouse, multigene family, adenosine triphosphatase, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, binding site, nonhistone protein, Research, nucleotide sequence, Non-Histone, DNA binding protein, Genes, Multiprotein Complexes, physiology, chromatin, K562 Cells, metabolism, Insect
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, cohesin, Cell Cycle Proteins, Genes, Insect, protein binding, K562 cell line, Mice, Drosophila Proteins, multiprotein complex, animal, genetics, Drosophila protein, Adenosine Triphosphatases, condensin, repressor protein, Chromosome Mapping, CCCTC-binding factor, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, chromosomal mapping, consensus sequence, Multigene Family, 570, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, transcription factor TFIIIC, cell cycle protein, Consensus Sequence, Animals, Humans, transcription factor III, human, gene, mouse, multigene family, adenosine triphosphatase, Binding Sites, Base Sequence, binding site, nonhistone protein, Research, nucleotide sequence, Non-Histone, DNA binding protein, Genes, Multiprotein Complexes, physiology, chromatin, K562 Cells, metabolism, Insect
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 256 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |