<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A method is presented for Bayesian model selection without explicitly computing evidences, by using a combined likelihood and introducing an integer model selection parameter $n$ so that Bayes factors, or more generally posterior odds ratios, may be read off directly from the posterior of $n$. If the total number of models under consideration is specified a priori, the full joint parameter space $(��, n)$ of the models is of fixed dimensionality and can be explored using standard Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) or nested sampling methods, without the need for reversible jump MCMC techniques. The posterior on $n$ is then obtained by straightforward marginalisation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by application to several toy models. We then apply it to constraining the dark energy equation-of-state using a free-form reconstruction technique. We show that $��$CDM is significantly favoured over all extensions, including the simple $w(z){=}{\rm constant}$ model.
Published in MNRAS. Article is 13 pages long including 12 figures, 3 tables and 2 appendices
methods: statistical, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), FOS: Physical sciences, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, dark energy, methods: data analysis, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), equation of state, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
methods: statistical, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), FOS: Physical sciences, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, dark energy, methods: data analysis, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), equation of state, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 61 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |