Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.i...
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ESRB and PEGI’s Flawed ‘Includes Random Items’ Label- Self-Regulation of Random Reward Mechanisms (e.g. Loot Boxes) Alone Fails to Ensure Consumer Protection

Authors: Xiao, Leon Y.;

ESRB and PEGI’s Flawed ‘Includes Random Items’ Label- Self-Regulation of Random Reward Mechanisms (e.g. Loot Boxes) Alone Fails to Ensure Consumer Protection

Abstract

This is a pre-print of an article accepted for publication in the International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. The final authenticated version will be available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00329-6. The three flaws of the ESRB and PEGI's introduction of the 'Includes Random Items' label are identified. This self-regulatory measure fails to provide sufficient information about the randomised in-game purchase mechanics; does not appropriately identify gambling as gambling and fails to guarantee minimum age ratings to protect young children; and can be circumvented with a separate line of products. Self-regulation alone is insufficient at protecting consumers from loot box-related harms. Legal restrictions on the sale of loot boxes in the short-term and the adoption of ethical game design by the industry in the long term are necessary to ensure consumer protection.

Related Organizations
Keywords

bepress|Arts and Humanities|Film and Media Studies, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Art and Design, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Art and Design, bepress|Law|Science and Technology Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Film and Media Studies|Other Film and Media Studies, LawArXiv|Law, LawArXiv|Law|Science and Technology Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Digital Humanities, bepress|Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Art and Design|Game Design, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Film and Media Studies|Other Film and Media Studies, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Digital Humanities, LawArXiv|Law|Internet Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Art and Design|Game Design, bepress|Law|Computer Law, bepress|Law|Internet Law, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities, LawArXiv|Arts and Humanities|Film and Media Studies, LawArXiv|Law|Computer Law, bepress|Arts and Humanities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities