
pmid: 10494751
Earlobe skin blood flow measured by laser Doppler flowmetry often shows low-frequency oscillations with a frequency around 0.1 Hz. We evaluated the effects of different sympathetic blocking techniques on the oscillations. Power spectrum of 5-min time series of beat-to-beat peak earlobe skin blood flow showed a distinct spectral peak at a frequency around 0.1 Hz (mean +/- SD, 0.107+/-0.016 Hz). The power of the spectral peak measured as coefficient of component variance (CCV) was diminished with total spinal anesthesia (TSA, n = 4) and cervicothoracic epidural anesthesia (CTEA, n = 4; P<0.05 for both). The CCV was unchanged significantly with bilateral thoracic sympathetic ganglionic excision (TSGE, n = 5). Right stellate ganglion block (RSGB, n = 6) caused a trend towards an increase in the CCV on the right (blocked)-side (P = 0.072) but no change on the left (intact)-side. Cross-spectrum analysis revealed that the low-frequency oscillations were not coherent between the right- and left-side earlobes or with low-frequency oscillations in systolic blood pressure either before or after RSGB. TSA and CTEA are known to cause extensive sympathetic nerve blockade in a broad area, while TSGE and RSGB are known to cause local and partial sympathetic blockade. Our results suggest that although the low-frequency oscillations in earlobe skin blood flow may be mediated non-neurally, magnitude of the oscillations may be modified by sympathetic vasomotor tone.
Adult, Anesthesia, Epidural, Male, Periodicity, Ganglia, Sympathetic, Ganglionic Blockers, Lidocaine, Regional Blood Flow, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry, Humans, Female, Anesthetics, Local, Ear, External, Skin
Adult, Anesthesia, Epidural, Male, Periodicity, Ganglia, Sympathetic, Ganglionic Blockers, Lidocaine, Regional Blood Flow, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry, Humans, Female, Anesthetics, Local, Ear, External, Skin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
