
Two self-report surveys of delinquent behavior, the National Youth Survey and the Monitoring the Future study, indicate different rates of prevalence for illegal behavior. Trends in the two series differ also, and this has been taken as evidence for differential validity between the two studies. Comparison of the two data sets indicates that difference between them could be attributable primarily to differences in sampling design, the administration of the surveys, and the wording of specific questions. There appears to be little support for the assertion that one data set is more or less valid than the other for measuring rates or trends in crime and delinquency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
