
Even when starting with a very poor initial guess, the iterative configuration interaction (iCI) approach can converge from above to full CI very quickly by constructing and diagonalizing a small Hamiltonian matrix at each macro/micro-iteration. However, iCI scales exponentially with respect to the numbers of electrons and orbitals. The problem can be mitigated by observing that a vast number of configurations have little weights in the wave function and do not contribute to the correlation energy. The real questions are then (a) how to identify important configurations in the early stage of the calculation and (b) how to account for the residual contributions of those unimportant configurations. It is generally true that if a high-quality yet compact variational space can be determined for describing the static correlation, a low-order treatment of the residual dynamic correlation would be sufficient. While this is common to all selected CI schemes, the `iCI with selection' scheme presented here has the following distinctive features: (1) Full spin symmetry is maintained. (2) Although the selection is performed on individual CSFs, it is orbital configurations (oCFG) that are used as the organizing units. (3) Given a coefficient pruning-threshold, the selection of important oCFGs/CSFs is performed iteratively until convergence. (4) At each iteration for the growth of wave function, the first-order interacting space is decomposed into disjoint subspaces to reduce memory requirement and facilitate parallelization. (5) Upper bounds for the interactions between oCFG pairs are used to screen each first-order interacting subspace before the first-order coefficients of individual CSFs are evaluated. (6) Upon termination of the selection, dynamic correlation is estimated by using the ENPT2 theory. The efficacy of the iCIPT2 scheme is demonstrated numerically by taking several examples.
Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), Physics - Chemical Physics, FOS: Physical sciences
Chemical Physics (physics.chem-ph), Physics - Chemical Physics, FOS: Physical sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
