
doi: 10.1038/1821033a0
pmid: 13590221
Dictyocotyle coeliaca Nybelin, 1941, the only nionogenetic trematode ever to be found in the cœlom of a vertebrate, was described from two specimens, one from Raia lintea near Skagen and the other from R. radiata at Trondheim. Ten years ago one of us described two other specimens from R. clavata and expressed the hope that a look-out would be kept for the trematode in zoological laboratories1. This appeal brought nine specimens from J. E. N. Sloan, formerly of the Zoology Department, University of Edinburgh, and it seems to have led to the publication of two original papers. In neither paper was the total number of parasites specified, but 16 out of 55 Raia naevus and 31 out of 73 R. radiata taken on Scottish fishing grounds2 and 35 out of 135 R. naevus landed at Plymouth3 were infected. Mean numbers of parasites per fish were 7 and 4 respectively, and in each instance rays of other species did not yield any parasites. This trematode closely resembles the common cloacal parasite Calicotyle kroyeri, differing chiefly in the nature of the posterior adhesive organ (opisthaptor), which is a delicate hookless disk showing faint markings or irregular shapes and sizes. These simulate but are not suctorial compartments, or loculi, such as are found in Calicotyle and other Monocotylidae, and mainly for this reason the taxonomic status of Dictyocotyle remains undetermined. Llewellyn and Green3 believe it “distinctly possible” that the host landed at Brixham “had been mis-identified”. When at the time confirmation was sought, Dr. E. B. Francis was emphatic, stating, “the species of Raia (as mentioned in my previous letter !) was ‘clavata’, source Brixham” (letter dated March 26, 1947).
Animals, Trematoda
Animals, Trematoda
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
