
pmid: 34896990
The aim: Determining the ability of samples based on MMSC – AT differentiating in the osteogenic direction. Materials and methods: The study was conducting at Bukovinian State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine. Adipose tissue samples were obtaining from the neck of 60 experimental animals (white Wistar rats). Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells of adipose tissue were obtained by grinding adipose tissue of rats in 0.1% collagenase 1A . Alkaline phosphatase activity was assessing by using the Alkaline Phosphatase Detection Kit (Sigma, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Osteopontin gene expression was determining by immunocytochemical method. To determine the mRNA used the PCR method, which is associated with reverse transcription (RT-PCR) in the area of quantification of gene expression to the marker BGP. Results: On the 21st day of observations, the expression of mRNA encoding the BGP gene decreased in samples № 1 and № 3 to 35,800 ± 420.0 copies and to 35,000 ± 400.0 copies, p1<0.01, p>0.05. Also was observing growth of copies of the BGP gene in samples № 2 and № 4 in 2.1, р<0.01 and 2.2 times, р-р2<0.05, relative to the data in sample № 1. Conclusions: Comparative study of osteoplastic properties samples MMSC-AT showed that a larger number of cells differentiate into the osteoblasts in samples containing MMSC-AT + PRP (№ 2) and MMSC-AT + PRP + «Kolapan» (№ 4). This has been proven higher alkaline phosphatase activity, higher levels osteopontin expression, and higher levels BGP gene expression.
Adipose Tissue, Osteogenesis, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Rats, Wistar, Rats
Adipose Tissue, Osteogenesis, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Rats, Wistar, Rats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
