
pmid: 22513371
Within interphase cells, microtubules (MTs) are organized in a cell-specific manner to support cell shape and function. Here, we report that coordination between stable and dynamic MTs determines and maintains the highly elongated bristle cell shape. By following MT-decorating hooks and by tracking EB1 we identified two MT populations within bristles: a stable MT population polarized with their minus ends distal to the cell body, and a dynamic MT population that exhibits mixed polarity. Manipulating MT dynamics by Klp10A downregulation demonstrates that MTs can initiate new shaft extensions and thus possess the ability to determine growth direction. Actin filament bundling subsequently supports the newly formed shaft extensions. Analysis of ik2 mutant bristles, established by elongation defects in the Drosophila ikkε homolog, led to the observation that stable and dynamic MT orientation and polarized organization are important for proper bristle elongation. Thus, we demonstrate for the first time that coordination between stable and dynamic MT sets that are axially organized yet differently polarized drives cell elongation.
Analysis of Variance, Microscopy, Confocal, Phalloidine, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Cell Polarity, Kinesins, Microtubules, Time-Lapse Imaging, I-kappa B Kinase, Drosophila melanogaster, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Sensilla, Cell Shape, Interphase, Microtubule-Associated Proteins
Analysis of Variance, Microscopy, Confocal, Phalloidine, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Cell Polarity, Kinesins, Microtubules, Time-Lapse Imaging, I-kappa B Kinase, Drosophila melanogaster, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Sensilla, Cell Shape, Interphase, Microtubule-Associated Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
