Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The survey instrument was organized around four domains in which a cooperative could conceivably provide benefits to participants. These domains were: Knowledge sharing Labor sharing Cooperatively-sourced funding Cooperatively-owned tools and infrastructure Respondents were asked to indicate which domain(s) would be of interest to them and the publications they represented. Each domain was then broken down further, and respondents could also offer their own ideas in an open response field. In total, the survey yielded 74 recorded responses, 68 of which consented to the privacy notice and 53 of which completed the survey. The survey could be completed anonymously, and just 32 of the 53 complete responses provided contact information and thus connected their responses to the publications they represented. We further guaranteed that all public presentations of the survey data would be given in aggregated and anonymized form. The survey responses were inconclusive in and of themselves, but demonstrated interest and provided the basis to begin conversations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts