
Статья посвящена истории экклезиологических поисков русских ученых периода расцвета отечественной богословской мысли протоиереев Георгия Флоровского и Василия Зеньковского. Вновь актуальны вопросы о единстве и единственности церкви, экклезиологическом статусе христианских конфессий, возможности и путях обретения христианского единства. В духе святоотеческого учения вопросы решаются названными богословами через призму сакраментологии, как ключевого аспекта христианского вероучения. В статье, как и в трудах протоиереев Василия и Георгия нет готовых ответов на сложные вопросы, но есть образцы высокой культуры богословской мысли в сложной и актуальной области церковной науки. Знакомство с методикой и методологией современного богословия обязательно для студентов и всех, интересующихся богословскими основаниями современной церковной жизни. The article is devoted to the history of the ecclesiological searches of Archpriests Georges Florovsky and Vasily Zenkovsky, Russian scholars of «the golden age» of national theological thought. The questions concerning the unity and singularity of the Church, the ecclesiological status of Christian denominations, the possibility and ways of gaining Christian unity become relevant again. In the spirit of the patristic teaching, the theologians resolve these issues through the prism of sacramentology as the key aspect of Christianity. In the article, as in the works of Zenkovsky and Florovsky, there are no ready-to-use answers to difficult questions, but there are examples of a high culture of theological thought in the complex and currently important field of Church Science. Exposure to the methods and methodology of modern theology is mandatory for students and everyone who is interested in the theological foundations of modern church life.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
