Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners

Authors: John H, Grose; Emily, Buss;

Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners

Abstract

This study examined within- and across-electrode-channel processing of temporal gaps in successful users of MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implants. The first experiment tested across-ear gap duration discrimination (GDD) in four listeners with bilateral implants. The results demonstrated that across-ear GDD thresholds are elevated relative to monaural, within-electrode-channel thresholds; the size of the threshold shift was approximately the same as for monaural, across-electrode-channel configurations. Experiment 1 also demonstrated a decline in GDD performance for channel-asymmetric markers. The second experiment tested the effect of envelope fluctuation on gap detection (GD) for monaural markers carried on a single electrode channel. Results from five cochlear implant listeners indicated that envelopes associated with 50-Hz wide bands of noise resulted in poorer GD thresholds than envelopes associated with 300-Hz wide bands of noise. In both cases GD thresholds improved when envelope fluctuations were compressed by an exponent of 0.2. The results of both experiments parallel those found for acoustic hearing, therefore suggesting that temporal processing of gaps is largely limited by factors central to the cochlea.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Auditory Threshold, Persons with Hearing Disabilities, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implants, Acoustic Stimulation, Time Perception, Auditory Perception, Humans, Correction of Hearing Impairment, Female, Hearing Loss, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!