The relevance of the Foucauldian lines "Certainly everything must be published, but can we agree on what everything means" to publications in scientific journals.
The relevance of the Foucauldian lines "Certainly everything must be published, but can we agree on what everything means" to publications in scientific journals.
This short communication deals with the issue of publishing positive and negative results in publications of science journals. Foucault's engaging lines from "What is an author?" considered for Fredrich Nietzsche's total body of work in terms of "praise," and "critique" is considered analogously to "positive" and "negative" results obtained from experiments. This presentation highlights the need to publish negative results, with recent literature calling for injecting 'intellectual humility in a scientific publication.
bepress|Education|Other Education, SocArXiv|Education, bepress|Education, Other Education, SocArXiv|Education|Other Education, Education
bepress|Education|Other Education, SocArXiv|Education, bepress|Education, Other Education, SocArXiv|Education|Other Education, Education
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!