Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Surgical Endoscopyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Surgical Endoscopy
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer

Authors: Shinichiro, Mori; Kenji, Baba; Masayuki, Yanagi; Yoshiaki, Kita; Shigehiro, Yanagita; Yasuto, Uchikado; Takaaki, Arigami; +6 Authors

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer

Abstract

We have evaluated the safety and feasibility of combining median-to-lateral and anterior-to-median (MLAM) approaches to perform laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with radical lymph node dissection along the gastrocolic trunk of Henle (GTH) for right hemicolon cancer.We retrospectively analyzed data obtained from a prospectively maintained database on 31 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic CME with radical lymph node dissection for right hemicolon cancer between January 2010 and December 2013. We used video recordings of the procedure to assess the quality of the surgery and completeness of CME. We also assessed operative data, pathological findings, length of large bowel resected, complications, BMI, operative time by experience of surgeon, and length of hospital stay.All patients had undergone en bloc resection of the enveloped parietal planes and radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk without any serious intraoperative complications. Twenty six and five patients graded mesocolic and intra-mesocolic plane, respectively. Five, three, eleven, and thirteen patients had T1, T2, T3, and T4 tumors, respectively. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 25, lymph node metastasis being identified in 11 patients. The mean length of large bowel resected was 21.8 cm. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 269 min and 39 mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred in any patient. Three patients had postoperative complications. The mean BMI was 22.6 kg/m(2). The mean operative time for patients stratified by BMI of <22 or ≥22 was 225 and 297 min, respectively. There were no correlations with operative time by experience of surgeon. The median postoperative hospital stay was 13 days.Laparoscopic CME conducted by fusion fascia exposure with radical lymph node dissection along the GTH via a combination of MLAM approaches is a safe and feasible procedure for right hemicolon cancer.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Operative Time, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Lymphatic Metastasis, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Female, Laparoscopy, Lymph Nodes, Aged, Mesocolon, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    44
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
44
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!