Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The burden of sinus disease in CF candidates for lung transplantation

Authors: Letizia Corinna Morlacchi; Mark Greer; Igor Tudorache; Francesco Blasi; Tobias Welte; Jochen G. Mainz; Jens Gottlieb;

The burden of sinus disease in CF candidates for lung transplantation

Abstract

Introduction: Sinus disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) is a known risk factor for disease progression, being the upper airways a primary colonization site of P.aeruginosa. These may function as reservoir for graft colonization after lung transplantation (LTx), increasing risk of rejection. This study examines the burden of sinus disease in CF patients undergoing evaluation for LTx. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on consecutive CF patients who attended the MHH outpatient clinics from 11/15 to 01/16 as possible candidates for LTx (NCT 02591524). Data about sinus disease (rhinosinusitis and/or polyposis) and its management were collected. Symptoms were evaluated with the SinoNasal Outcome Test 20 GAV(SNOT20). Upper airway colonization was assessed by microbiological culture of nasal lavage (NL). Results: 28 patients were enrolled, 3 refused to participate. Median age was 33(24-40) years. Sinus disease was reported in 14(50%) pts, of whom 13(46%) had undergone sinus surgery. No pt was receiving topical nasal antibiotics at inclusion. NL microbiology is depicted in figure 1. Median SNOT20 was higher in those who underwent surgery [42(20-51) vs. 20(12-30),p=0.04]. Conclusion: At least a half of the patients evaluated for LTx presented signs and/or symptoms of sinonasal disease; early identification of these patients is crucial to recommend appropriate treatment targeting eradication and hopefully improve lung transplantation outcomes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!